Dedicated team
A stable, embedded team for continuous product work with predictable monthly cost.
Get in touch The commercial shape of an engagement changes what it is like to deliver. These are the four we offer, what each is genuinely good at, and where each one starts to strain.
A stable, embedded team for continuous product work with predictable monthly cost.
A defined deliverable with an agreed price, suited to well-understood problems.
Specific skills added to your existing team for a defined period.
A short, fixed engagement that produces a plan and an estimate you can act on.
The wrong model makes good delivery expensive. These are the conditions under which each one is the right answer.
Product work rarely finishes. If the backlog keeps refilling and continuity matters more than a fixed end date, a standing team costs less over a year than repeatedly rebuilding context.
A fixed price needs a fixed specification. That works well for a defined integration or a migration with known endpoints, and works badly for anything still being discovered.
If your team knows what to build and simply lacks a skill or the capacity, adding people to your existing process is cheaper and faster than handing the work to a separate team.
A short fixed engagement that produces a plan, an architecture, and a costed roadmap. It is the least expensive way to find out that a project should be scoped differently.
These terms do not vary by model. They are the parts buyers are most often surprised by, so they are stated here rather than buried in a schedule.
The repository, the infrastructure, and the documentation are yours from the first commit, under every model.
Thirty days on a dedicated team or augmentation. Fixed-scope work ends when the deliverable is accepted.
Scope changes are priced and agreed before work starts on them, never absorbed silently and invoiced later.
One blended rate per role, published in the contract. No separate charges for project management.
Progress, spend, and risks shared on an agreed cadence, including in the months that go badly.
Handover documentation and a walkthrough are part of the engagement, not a separate purchase.
Yes, and it is common. Discovery sprints frequently become dedicated teams, and dedicated teams sometimes reduce to augmentation once your own hiring catches up. We would rather change the model than keep an arrangement that has stopped fitting.
A discovery sprint is the smallest sensible unit of work. Below that there is not enough time to understand the problem properly, and an answer produced without understanding it is not worth paying for.
By writing the scope down in enough detail that both sides can tell whether something is inside it. When a request falls outside, we price it separately rather than absorbing it and losing interest in the quality of the original work.
Regularly. Most systems have more than one party touching them. We agree interfaces and ownership boundaries at the start so integration problems have an owner rather than a debate.
Share the goal, the challenge, or the idea. We will help turn it into a clear digital path.